MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113423066 · doi:10.1080/09541440600926716

Learning the correlational structure of stimuli in a one-attribute classification task

2006· article· en· W2113423066 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Animal Learning Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCarleton UniversityUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyTask (project management)Cognitive psychologyCategorizationArtificial intelligenceStimulus (psychology)Test (biology)Social psychologyMachine learningComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In category learning experiments, participants typically do not learn within-category correlations unless the composition of the categories or the task demands compel them to do so. To determine if correlations among attributes could be learned without explicitly focusing the participants’ attention on them, a task was designed that allowed stimuli to be classified on the basis of a single perfectly predictive attribute. Each training stimulus also included attributes that were either perfectly or partly correlated with the rule attribute. Then, in a test phase, the impact of eliminating the rule attribute on classification was evaluated. The experiment showed that some of the attributes that were perfectly correlated with the rule attribute were learned. These attributes could be used to classify the test exemplars even though the rule attribute had been removed. This experiment provides evidence that within-category correlations can be learned incidentally during classification tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it