Some Features of Geomagnetic Micropulsations Observed During the Recent Quiet Solar Years, with Particular Reference to Data Obtained at the Near Conjugate Stations of Great Whale River and Byrd
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In dedicating this paper to Professor Sydney Chapman, the authors have taken the opportunity of describing some of the salient features of the early history of geomagnetic micropulsations since 1918, which were responsible for the Canadian interest in this field and the type of equipment still in use at many ground stations. In a sense, this is a review paper of the more recent work in this field, thus excluding that covered by other reviews such as that of Troitskaya (1964) and Kato, Saito and other workers in Japan. The importance of observations at polar stations is touched upon in relation to similar observations at mid-latitude stations during the recent years of quiet solar conditions when the 27-day solar rotation period is often prominent. This period is especially well-marked at the two near-conjugate stations, Byrd and Great Whale River, in the southern and northern auroral zones. The correlation between these two stations is only briefly mentioned, since it will be the subject of a separate report. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the very important results of satellite observations. Better co-ordination of satellite data with that received on the ground is needed and internationally planned operations of land stations for the coming years of greater solar activity are necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it