MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114179926 · doi:10.1109/percomw.2005.21

CanCore: Best Practices for Learning Object Metadata in Ubiquitous Computing Environments

2005· article· en· W2114179926 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Learning in Education
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUbiquitous computingComputer scienceMetadataContext-aware pervasive systemsLearning objectInteroperabilityMultimediaWorld Wide WebFlexibility (engineering)Mobile deviceContext (archaeology)Ubiquitous robotHuman–computer interactionMobile computingAdaptabilityArtificial intelligenceRobot learningTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the potential of ubiquitous computing technologies for learning and education (i.e. "ubiquitous e-learning") is a relatively new undertaking. Ubiquitous computing refers to making computers imperceptibly and pervasively available to the user in her environment. The notion of ubiquitous computing as a research issue itself dates back only to 1988 (Weiser, 1991), and the popular realization of this technology in the form of wireless mobile devices such as mobile telephones, personal digital assistants, Webpads, laptops, onboard automobile navigation systems, and other portable, networked computing technologies has only recently taken place. This paper begins from the premise that the emergent requirements of ubiquitous e-learning are very well suited to the flexibility and adaptability of a learning objects approach. The paper starts with a brief consideration of the characteristics and requirements of ubiquitous e-learning, and also explains the learning object approach and the standards and infrastructures used to support it. It then identifies challenges presented by the fact that these standards and infrastructures have not been developed with the requirements of ubiquitous e-learning in mind. The paper then suggests a number of adaptations or extensions to one specific and important e-learning standard - the standard for "learning object metadata." In discussing the application of this standard to ubiquitous e-learning, this paper makes significant reference to the CanCore guidelines for the implementation of learning object metadata in order to ensure maximum reusability and interoperability of data in this new context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Learning in EducationFrench-language works237,207