MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114388943 · doi:10.1109/icip.2005.1530293

Segmentation of prostate boundaries using regional contrast enhancement

2005· article· en· W2114388943 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligencePixelComputer scienceComputer visionSegmentationContrast (vision)Image segmentationKalman filterBoundary (topology)Fuzzy inference systemGrey levelPattern recognition (psychology)Fuzzy logicMathematicsAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemFuzzy control system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a novel method for automatic prostate segmentation in transrectal ultrasound images is presented. Morphological grey level transformations are first used to generate an image with enough bright intensity around the prostate. This image is then thresholded to produce a binary image. Then by finding and using a point as the inside point for the prostate, a Kalman estimator is used to isolate the prostate boundary from any irrelevant parts and produce a roughly segmented version (as coarse estimation). Consequently, a fuzzy inference system describing regional and gray level information is employed to enhance the contrast of the prostate with respect to the background. Using strong edges obtained from this enhanced image and information from pixels gradients and also the characteristics in the vicinity of the coarse estimation, the final boundary is extracted. A number of experiments are conducted to validate this method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207