MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114630153 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2009.12.091590

Power allocation for coded OFDM via linear programming

2009· article· en· W2114630153 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Kenarsari-Anhari, Lutz Lampe

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceQuadrature amplitude modulationPhase-shift keyingModulation (music)Transmission (telecommunications)Convex optimizationAlgorithmBit error rateElectronic engineeringMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsMathematicsDecoding methodsRegular polygonChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The combination of bit-interleaved coded modulation and orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (BICOFDM) forms a powerful coded modulation scheme for transmission over wideband channels. Recently, Moon and Cox presented a new power allocation method to minimize the biterror rate (BER) of BIC-OFDM. It requires the solution of a convex optimization problem and is limited to (complex) binary transmission. Motivated by their work, in this letter we present an alternative power allocation method, which has the advantages of being a linear program and applicable to arbitrary signal constellations. Our approach relies on a BER approximation which becomes tight for asymptotically large signal-to-noise ratios. Simulative evidence shows that the proposed power allocation method achieves a performance very close to that from for the case of quadrature phase-shift keying.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207