MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114675462 · doi:10.1002/pen.20814

Application of essential work of fracture concept to toughness characterization of high‐density polyethylene

2007· article· en· W2114675462 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Engineering and Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeckingMaterials scienceHigh-density polyethyleneFracture toughnessComposite materialDeformation (meteorology)Ultimate tensile strengthToughnessTensile testingPolyethyleneFracture (geology)Characterization (materials science)Plane stressStress (linguistics)Work (physics)Structural engineeringFinite element methodMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Deformation and fracture toughness of high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) in plane‐stress tension was studied using the concept of essential work of fracture (EWF). Strain range for necking was determined from uniaxial tensile test, and was used to explain the deformation transition for 2‐staged crack growth in double‐edge‐notched tensile test. Through work‐partitioning, EWF values for HDPE were determined for each stage of the crack growth. Appropriateness of these EWF values to represent the material toughness is discussed. The study concludes that the EWF values for ductile polymers like HDPE may not be constant, but vary with the deformation behaviour involved in the crack growth process. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:1327–1337, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it