MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115076670 · doi:10.1080/014311601750038857

Evaluation of C-band SAR data for wetlands mapping

2001· article· en· W2115076670 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Remote Sensing · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersGlaucoma Research Society of Canada
KeywordsWetlandRemote sensingPolarimetryBogSynthetic aperture radarEnvironmental scienceVegetation classificationPolarization (electrochemistry)Vegetation (pathology)PeatGeologyGeographyScatteringPhysicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This publication reports results of an experiment carried out to examine the potential of polarimetric C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) for mapping various wetland classes found in the Mer Bleue region (near Ottawa, Canada). The Mer Bleue region was surveyed by the C-band (5.3 GHz) polarimetric (HH, HV, VH, VV) SAR of the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS) at three times within the vegetation season: 16 June (spring flush for vegetation), 6 July (mature growth stage for vegetation) and 3 October 1995 (senescence). Signatures of six different cover types (forested and nonforested peat bog, marsh, open water, clearing and forests) have been derived as a function of incidence angle. Separability between various classes was used to determine the relationships between season(s) and polarization(s) needed to differentiate various wetland classes. A supervised classification was used for wetlands mapping by means of multipolarization data. These investigations demonstrate some of the capabilities of SAR at C-band for mapping wetlands. The cross-polarization data provided the best separation between the observed classes. The October dataset was better suited for discriminating between the classes present than the other periods observed. The overall accuracies of the classification are 73% for June, 73% for July and 86% for October. Classification using a single polarization has been investigated and the results have shown that the HH and cross-polarizations are better than VV polarization. For October, the percentage of all pixels correctly classified is 74% for HH polarization, 76% for cross-polarization, and 59% for VV polarization. Investigations were carried out to determine whether temporal changes can be used to increase the information content of single polarization C-band SAR data, which are now available from ERS-2 and RADARSAT satellites. They demonstrated that the use of multitemporal data acquired in June, July and October do not provide a substantial amelioration of the classification of wetlands when the differentiation is not possible in any single period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it