MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115101923 · doi:10.1109/72.963787

Compound binomial processes in neural integration

2001· article· en· W2115101923 on OpenAlexaff
H.C. Card

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceStochastic processBernoulli's principleStochastic neural networkBernoulli processEvent (particle physics)MultiplexingBernoulli trialAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceRecurrent neural networkStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Explores some of the properties of stochastic digital signal processing in which the input signals are represented as sequences of Bernoulli events. The event statistics of the resulting stochastic process may be governed by compound binomial processes, depending upon how the individual input variables to a neural network are stochastically multiplexed. Similar doubly stochastic statistics can also result from datasets which are Bernoulli mixtures, depending upon the temporal persistence of the mixture components at the input terminals to the network. The principal contribution of these results is in determining the required integration period of the stochastic signals for a given precision in pulsed digital neural networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Neural NetworksSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207