MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115183675 · doi:10.1002/jrs.842

Study of gallium(III) nitrate hydrate and aqueous solutions: Raman spectroscopy and <i>ab initio</i> molecular orbital calculations of gallium(III) water clusters

2002· article· en· W2115183675 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Raman Spectroscopy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversitySt. Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRaman spectroscopyGalliumCoordination spherePerchlorateAqueous solutionAb initioInner sphere electron transferIonAb initio quantum chemistry methodsHydrateCrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Inorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryMoleculeCrystal structurePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Raman spectra of aqueous Ga(III) perchlorate and nitrate solutions were measured at room temperature. From Ga(ClO 4 ) 3 solutions, a strongly polarized band at 526 cm −1 and two depolarized modes at 430 and 328 cm −1 were assigned to ν 1 ( a 1 g ), ν 2 ( e g ) and ν 5 ( f 2 g ) of the hexaaquagallium(III) ion, [Ga(OH 2 ) 6 3+ ] ( O h symmetry), respectively. The infrared active mode at 555 cm −1 was assigned to ν 3 ( f 1 u ). The Raman spectroscopic data suggest that the hexaaquagallium(III) ion is thermodynamically stable in perchlorate solutions (no inner‐sphere complex formation). In a supersaturated solution and in concentrated Ga(NO 3 ) 3 solutions most of the gallium(III) exists in the form of an outer‐sphere ion pair, [Ga(OH 2 ) 6 3+ NO 3 − ], but a small amount of the gallium(III) occurs as an inner‐sphere complex, [Ga(OH 2 ) 5 ONO 2 ] 2+ , which could be confirmed using Raman spectroscopy. Upon dilution, the fraction of the weak inner‐sphere nitrato complex diminishes and only the outer‐sphere complex is observable. Ab initio geometry optimizations and wavenumber calculations of [Ga(OH 2 ) 6 3+ ] were carried out at the Hartree–Fock and second order Møller–Plesset levels of theory, using various basis sets up to 6–31+G*. The global minimum structure of the hexaaqua Ga(III) species corresponds to symmetry T h . The unscaled vibrational wavenumbers of the [Ga(OH 2 ) 6 3+ ] are reported. The unscaled vibrational wavenumbers of the GaO 6 unit are lower than the experimental values (∼15%). Scaling the wavenumbers reproduces only partially the measured values for the GaO 6 unit. The theoretical binding enthalpy for [Ga(OH 2 ) 6 3+ ] was calculated and accounts for ∼60% of the experimental single ion hydration enthalpy for Ga(III). Ab initio geometry optimizations and wavenumber calculations are also reported for a [Ga(OH 2 ) 18 3+ ] (Ga[6+12]) cluster with six water molecules in the first sphere and 12 water molecules in the second sphere. The global minimum occurs for T symmetry. Calculated wavenumbers of the gallium [6+12] cluster correspond well with the observed wavenumbers in solution. The ν 1 GaO 6 (unscaled) mode occurs at 524 cm −1 , which is in good agreement with the experimental value. The theoretical binding enthalpy for [Ga(OH 2 ) 18 3+ ] was calculated and is slightly underestimated compared with the experimental single ion hydration enthalpy of Ga(III). The water molecules of the first sphere form strong H‐bonds with water molecules in the second hydration shell because of the strong polarizing effect of the Ga(III) ion. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it