MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115613969 · doi:10.4187/respcare.05501451

The Antimicrobial Effect of Nitric Oxide on the Bacteria That Cause Nosocomial Pneumonia in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

2005· article· en· W2115613969 on OpenAlexaff
Bevin McMullin, Dean R. Chittock, Diane Roscoe, Harjinder Garcha, Lexin Wang, Christopher C.J. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiratory Care · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAntimicrobialColony-forming unitAgar plateMicrobiologyPneumoniaIntensive careMechanical ventilationIntensive care unitSalineNitric oxideBacteriaAnesthesiaIntensive care medicineBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial pneumonia is the second most frequent nosocomial infection and the leading cause of death from hospital-acquired infection. Endogenously produced nitric oxide is an important component of the body's natural defense mechanism. Recent studies have demonstrated that exogenous gaseous nitric oxide (gNO) is bactericidal and that inhaled gNO is beneficial to bacterial clearance. OBJECTIVE: Determine the antimicrobial effect of exogenous gNO in vitro against organisms from culture collections and pathogens derived from tracheal aspirates of mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia in an intensive care unit. METHODS: Using bacterial isolates in pure culture, a 0.5 McFarland standard (10(8) colony-forming-units [cfu] per mL) was prepared and further diluted to 1:1,000 with saline, to 10(5) cfu/mL. For each isolate tested, 3 mL was pipetted into each well of a 6-well plate, and placed in a specially designed incubator with compartments for both a treatment arm and a control arm. Both chambers received a continuous flow of heated, humidified gas. The treatment chamber had 200 ppm of gNO in the gas flow, which is higher than the clinically accepted concentration for gNO. Samples were drawn off at time intervals, plated onto Columbia agar base with 5% sheep blood, and placed in a traditional incubator at 35 degrees C for a minimum of 24 h. All tests were performed in duplicate. The colony-forming units were visually counted to determine percentage kill. RESULTS: There was total kill (100% of all colony-forming units) of each bacterial strain subjected to the test conditions at between 2 and 6 h of exposure to 200 ppm gNO. CONCLUSION: gNO is bactericidal against various strains of bacteria suspended in saline, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, and those that commonly cause nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. Future work should focus on developing strategies that maximize the antimicrobial effect while minimizing the effect of these same interventions on host cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespiratory CareSame topicNosocomial Infections in ICUFrench-language works237,207