MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115783725 · doi:10.1177/0094582x05286091

The State, the Bourgeoisie, and the Unions

2006· article· en· W2115783725 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLatin American Perspectives · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBourgeoisieAuthoritarianismState (computer science)Petite bourgeoisiePolitical economyPolitical scienceWorking classCapitalist stateFace (sociological concept)InstitutionLabour economicsSociologyDemocracyPublic administrationPoliticsEconomicsLawCapitalismSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mexico’s unions combine features of a state institution, a party machine, and an employment service with those of corrupt and authoritarian unions. These hybrid institutions have been partners with the state and the bourgeoisie in disciplining the working class both in the workplace and politically. A number of features of union organization and perspective contribute to this controlling role. The state and the bourgeoisie have again enlisted labor officialdom to contain working-class discontent in the face of the crisis of the Mexican regime and of the neoliberal project. This recycling of the system of labor control is fully compatible with the interests of this hybrid and opportunist set of labor leaders, interests that are far from those of their membership and the vast masses of unorganized workers. Rank-and-file workers and the left have not yet been able to launch an effective challenge to this system of control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it