MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115814444 · doi:10.1017/s0143385704000288

Limit measures for affine cellular automata II

2004· article· en· W2115814444 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueErgodic Theory and Dynamical Systems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbelian groupCombinatoricsMathematicsEndomorphismGroup (periodic table)Prime (order theory)MonoidDiscrete mathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If M is a monoid, and A is an abelian group, then AM is a compact abelian group; a linear cellular automaton (LCA) is a continuous endomorphism F: AM − → AM that commutes with all shift maps. If F is diffusive, and µ is a harmonically mixing (HM) probability measure on AM, then the sequence {FNµ} ∞ N=1 weak*-converges to the Haar measure on AM, in density. Fully supported Markov measures on AZ are HM, and nontrivial LCA on A (ZD) are diffusive when A = Z/p is a prime cyclic group. In the present work, we provide sufficient conditions for diffusion of LCA on A (ZD) when A = Z/n is any cyclic group or when A = ( ) J Z /pr (p prime). We show that any fully supported Markov random field A (ZD) is HM (where A is any abelian group). We also provide examples of HM Markov measures not having full support, and measures on A Z which have the Kolmogorov property but which are not HM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it