MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116008496 · doi:10.1177/1206331205277350

Networked Communities

2005· article· en· W2116008496 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace and Culture · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media and Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNexus (standard)SociologyThe InternetAction (physics)PoliticsSpace (punctuation)Public relationsMedia studiesCollective actionSocial capitalPolitical scienceSocial scienceLawWorld Wide WebComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines social activist networks in Britain, the physical spaces they occupy, and how they facilitate protest actions while less tangibly providing shared emotional space. The nexus between physical and emotional spaces activists occupy in contemporary Britain is the key point of inquiry. Maffesoli’s notion of the social divine is used to help understand activists’ desire to seek connections and community while pursuing activism. Networks act as a link to emotional community while promoting further political activity, here anti–global capital and antiwar activism. Central to the idea of an activist network is using the Internet to disseminate plans. However, as the author aims to establish, the Internet is not the only networking tool available to activists. Action plans, ideas, and contacts are circulated via zines, at infoshops and stalls, and in social centers. Networks of activism develop rather than spontaneously emerge on the day of any given action; they emerge from the interaction of activists, in shared physical and/or emotional spaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it