MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Political Economy of Participatory Democracy in Brazil: A Case Study of Lages, 1977–1982

2012· article· en· W2116180757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Political Economy · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Solidarity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocratizationPoliticsCitizen journalismParticipatory democracyDemocracyPower (physics)SociologyPolitical economyFace (sociological concept)Political scienceEconomic systemEconomicsLawSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

J. Ricardo Tranjan’s “The Political Economy of Participatory Democracy in Brazil: A Case Study of Lages, 1977–1982” presents a historical, political-economic analysis of one of the precursory participatory municipal administrations in Brazil in the city of Lages, Santa Catarina. Tranjan considers how capitalist development may spur democratization processes by altering the balance of class power in favour of subordinate classes. This study of the Lages case demonstrates that including popular participation in local government was, at one point, a deliberate political move against one sector of the local ruling class, and was made possible by shifts in interclass power that resulted from changes in structural conditions. Tranjan’s political-economic analyses help us better understand the motivations of those pushing participatory reforms, the challenges they face, and the format of participatory initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it