MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116273197 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2010.2092130

Stochastic Analysis of the Normalized Subband Adaptive Filter Algorithm

2010· article· en· W2116273197 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsQuadrature (astronomy)GaussianAdaptive filterAlgorithmFilter (signal processing)Gaussian quadratureContinued fractionAdaptive quadratureMonte Carlo methodApplied mathematicsGaussian filterFraction (chemistry)Square (algebra)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceMathematical analysisIntegral equationStatisticsNyström method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the statistical behavior of the normalized subband adaptive filtering (NSAF) algorithm. An accurate statistical model of the NSAF algorithm is obtained. In the derivation, we focus on Gaussian correlated input signals. By assuming that the analysis filter bank is paraunitary and taking into account the full band adaptation mechanism of the NSAF, expressions for the first and the second moments of the adaptive filter weights are derived without invoking the slow adaptation assumption. In the derivations, several hyperelliptic integrals appear. To tackle those integrals induced by Gaussian correlated inputs, we first give a solution by resorting to the adaptive Lobatto quadrature. By invoking the averaging principle, two other approximation methods, the chi-square method and the partial fraction expansion method, are presented to approximate the statistical model as well. Monte Carlo (MC) simulation results corroborate our predictions. The Lobatto quadrature method achieves a good agreement with the MC simulation results, even for a relatively large step size. Compared with the chi-square method and the partial fraction expansion method, the Lobatto quadrature method gives better performance in terms of predicting the mean square error when the length of the adaptive filters is small to medium. The chi-square approximation method and the partial fraction expansion method give a satisfactory performance with a relatively low computational complexity when the filter length is large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it