Enhancing Prototype Reduction Schemes With Recursion: A Method Applicable for “Large” Data Sets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most of the prototype reduction schemes (PRS), which have been reported in the literature, process the data in its entirety to yield a subset of prototypes that are useful in nearest-neighbor-like classification. Foremost among these are the prototypes for nearest neighbor classifiers, the vector quantization technique, and the support vector machines. These methods suffer from a major disadvantage, namely, that of the excessive computational burden encountered by processing all the data. In this paper, we suggest a recursive and computationally superior mechanism referred to as adaptive recursive partitioning (ARP)_PRS. Rather than process all the data using a PRS, we propose that the data be recursively subdivided into smaller subsets. This recursive subdivision can be arbitrary, and need not utilize any underlying clustering philosophy. The advantage of ARP_PRS is that the PRS processes subsets of data points that effectively sample the entire space to yield smaller subsets of prototypes. These prototypes are then, in turn, gathered and processed by the PRS to yield more refined prototypes. In this manner, prototypes which are in the interior of the Voronoi spaces, and thus ineffective in the classification, are eliminated at the subsequent invocations of the PRS. We are unaware of any PRS that employs such a recursive philosophy. Although we marginally forfeit accuracy in return for computational efficiency, our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed recursive mechanism yields classification comparable to the best reported prototype condensation schemes reported to-date. Indeed, this is true for both artificial data sets and for samples involving real-life data sets. The results especially demonstrate that a fair computational advantage can be obtained by using such a recursive strategy for "large" data sets, such as those involved in data mining and text categorization applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".