MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116337520 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2011.2118237

A New Technique to Detect Faults in De-Energized Distribution Feeders—Part I: Scheme and Asymmetrical Fault Detection

2011· article· en· W2116337520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThyristorFault detection and isolationFault (geology)EngineeringOverhead (engineering)Fault indicatorVoltageElectronic engineeringScheme (mathematics)Electrical engineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Re-energizing an overhead distribution feeder safely is a major consideration for a utility's safe work practice. One way to improve the safety is to determine whether the feeder still experiences short circuits before it is energized. In this paper, a novel fault detection technique is proposed to detect if a de-energized distribution system still experiences short-circuit faults. The proposed method involves injecting a thyristor-generated-controllable signal into the de-energized feeder. The feeder voltage and current responses are analyzed to determine if a fault still exists. A thyristor gating control strategy and fault detection algorithm are also developed in this paper to detect all possible types of faults that can occur in a system. The effectiveness of the proposed method has been verified through theoretical analysis, computer simulations, and lab tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it