MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116405637 · doi:10.1521/siso.2011.75.3.297

Disposable Time, Freedom, and Care

2011· article· en· W2116405637 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience & Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Economy and Marxism
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealmNeoclassical economicsProduction (economics)EconomicsReproductionPoliticsConsumption (sociology)Means of productionPower (physics)Market economyEconomic systemSociologyMicroeconomicsLawPolitical scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Capitalist development reduces the social labor time necessary for the reproduction of labor power, creating a vast amount of disposable time , but harnesses it as surplus labor. In an alternative political economy of time, capitalist “production of wealth” would be replaced by the postcapitalist “wealth of production.” Marx famously saw the “true realm of freedom” as arising beyond that of “necessity,” i.e ., beyond humans’ interaction with nature. He thus distinguished between forms of activity that produce means of production and consumption, and those that are ends in themselves. But what of those forms of activity that are both means and ends? An example is the work of care, a form of activity not explored by Marx. Consideration of disposable time and care suggests that true freedom may not so much blossom beyond the realm of necessity, but instead involve an expansion and complexification of the human relationship with and within nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it