MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2116458357 · doi:10.1093/jnci/djn065

Results at Recruitment From a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Human Papillomavirus Testing Alone With Conventional Cytology as the Primary Cervical Cancer Screening Test

2008· article· en· W2116458357 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Guglielmo Ronco, Francesca Carozzi, Massimo Confortini, Paolo Palma, Annarosa Del Mistro, Anna Gillio‐Tos, D Minucci, Carlo Naldoni, Raffaella Rizzolo, Patrizia Schincaglia, R Volante, Marco Zappa, Manuel Zorzi, Jack Cuzick, Nereo Segnan

Bibliographic record

VenueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIstituto Oncologico VenetoOntario Institute for Regenerative MedicineUniversità degli Studi di TorinoUniversità degli Studi di PadovaUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeUniversità degli Studi di Verona
KeywordsColposcopyMedicineCytologyGynecologyCervical cancerCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaCancerPapillomaviridaeObstetricsInternal medicineOncologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.047
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.047
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.008
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.236
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations309
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute→Same topicCervical Cancer and HPV Research→French-language works237,207→