MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116466593 · doi:10.1142/s0129626403001483

Predicated Partial Redundancy Elimination using a Cost Analysis

2003· article· en· W2116466593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueParallel Processing Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedundancy (engineering)Computer scienceExploitCompilerPartial evaluationProbabilistic logicComputationData-flow analysisTransformation (genetics)Static analysisParallel computingTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmProgramming languageData flow diagramArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partial redundancy elimination (PRE) is a key technology for modern compilers. However traditional approaches are conservative and fail to exploit many opportunities for optimization. New PRE approaches which greatly increase the number of eliminated redundancies have been developed. However, they either cause the code size to explode or they cannot handle statements with side-effects. In this paper we describe a predicated partial redundancy elimination (PPRE) approach which can potentially remove all partial redundancies. To avoid performance overheads caused by predication, PPRE is applied selectively based on a cost model. The cost analysis presented in the paper utilizes probabilistic data-flow information to decide whether PPRE is profitable for each instance of a partially redundant computation. Refinements of the basic PPRE transformation are described in detail. In contrast to some other approaches our transformation is strictly semantics preserving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it