MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Latent Tuberculosis Infection Screening and 2-Year Outcome in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-Infected Patients in a Low-Prevalence Country

2015· article· en· W2117231096 on OpenAlexaff
A. Bourgarit, Gabriel Baron, Guillaume Breton, Pierre Tattevin, Christine Katlama, Clotilde Allavena, Pauline Campa, Philippe Ravaud, Olivier Lortholary, Guislaine Carcelain

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTuberculosisInterquartile rangeLatent tuberculosisTuberculinInternal medicineAsymptomaticProspective cohort studyQuantiFERONIncidence (geometry)Mycobacterium tuberculosisImmunologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculous infection decrease the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in HIV-infected patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of two IFN-γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing for the screening of latent infection in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 29 referral centers for HIV care in France. Asymptomatic, antiretroviral-naive patients infected with HIV-1 who consented to participate underwent two commercial tests (T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube ELISA test [QFT]) and skin test at enrollment and were followed up for clinical events during 24 months. RESULTS: Between March 2009 and 2011, 506 patients were included, of whom 415 performed the three tests. Median age was 38 years (interquartile range, 31-45 yr), with median CD4 cell count of 466/μL (337-615 μL), and HIV viral load of 4.5 log10 copies/ml (3.6-4.9 log10 copies/ml). At least one IFN-γ release assay was positive for 55 (13.5%) patients: QFT (n = 43), T-SPOT.TB (n = 34), both (n = 22). Skin test was positive (>5 mm) in 66 (15.9%) patients, with intertest agreement at 81 to 86%. On multivariate analysis, positive IFN-γ release assay was only correlated with country of birth (8.4% for France vs. 17.9% for high-prevalence countries, P = 0.004). Of the 55 patients with positive IFN-γ release assay, 8 (14.5%) developed active TB, all within 120 days. No other case of active TB was diagnosed. Once active TB was excluded, IFN-γ release assay-based latent infection prevalence was 11.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic screening for latent TB infection by IFN-γ release assay identifies a population at high risk of active TB over the next months. An extensive diagnostic work-up for active TB must follow positive IFN-γ release assay, before considering treatment of latent infection. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00805272).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicInfectious Diseases and TuberculosisFrench-language works237,207