On antijamming in general CDMA systems-part I: multiuser capacity analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The capacity of a general multiuser CDMA jamming channel is analyzed when the receiver has or lacks jammer state information. Analyses are carried out for noncooperative and cooperative users in uplink and downlink static and Nakagami fading channels. The results are applied to a versatile multiaccess channel model which is based on the time-bandwidth dimensionality and is considered for the user capacity analysis of a variety of multiuser spread spectrum systems contaminated by jamming. In this model, different users are distinguished by signatures of either direct sequence or hopping type. It is found that the jammer should spread its energy evenly over all degrees of freedom in order to minimize the average capacity. Also, the capacity behavior appears to be dominated more by knowledge of jammer state information than by the effects of fading. The capacity of downlink channels in cooperative schemes is found to be more sensitive to changes in fading severity, compared with the capacity of other kinds of channels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it