MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117627179 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.1994.518985

LMS-optimal notch filters with improved transient performance

2002· article· en· W2117627179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Control theory (sociology)Transient responseTransparency (behavior)Transient analysisPole–zero plotMathematicsBand-stop filterContraction (grammar)Low-pass filterComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)EngineeringTransfer functionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of a pole-contraction factor (/spl alpha/) with a value close to unity in the Constrained Notch Filters (CNFs) causes excessively long transient response. For practically useful values of /spl alpha/, the transient duration is reduced, on the other hand however, the error in transparency as measured by the MSE is increased. In this paper, we increase the order of CNFs by a strategic pole/zero placement to address this tradeoff. Two approaches of finding these pole/zero locations are shown. One of the methods is optimal in the LMS sense, while the other, though suboptimal, yields a closed-form solution. The resulting filters show a significant improvement in the transient duration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207