Teleo-reactive autonomous mobile navigation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biological creatures apparently execute many tasks in the world by using a combination of routine skills, without doing any extensive reasoning. In recent years researchers have used this as a guide to formulate behavioral architectures for robot control. The authors have adopted the teleo-reactive (TR) formalism introduced by Nils Nilsson (1994) for their behavioral architecture. The formalism is a programming methodology for situated agents. The authors have implemented and expanded the TR formalism so that the program interpreter executes the computations in parallel. This is necessary in order for a situated agent to interact with its environment in real-time. Further extensions to the TR formalism include condition and action expressions, the flexibility of controlling how and when conditions are evaluated and the ability to control the computation frequency rate of condition processes. The authors' formalism is called TR+. A TR+ program was used to navigate a robot in the authors' lab in real-time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it