MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118001728 · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.038

Use of telemedicine for providing medical abortion

2013· article· en· W2118001728 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsMedicineTelemedicineLibrary scienceAbortionCitationMedia studiesLawPregnancySociologyHealth careComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Telemedicine has been used to provide abortion in several ways. The website Women on Web [1] uses e-mail support to facilitate the provision of medical abortion to women in situations in which safe abortion is not available [2]. Some US clinics offer medical abortions in which the patients see a counselor in the clinic but see the doctor via videoconferencing [3]. Routine ultrasound is usually used to date the pregnancy and determine abortion success in North America but serial quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) values can also be used [4]. Because mifepristone is not available in Canada, the usual regimen is methotrexate (50 mg/m2 intramuscularly or orally) followed by misoprostol (800 μg vaginally) repeated twice 4–12 hours later. This regimen has a similar success rate to that of mifepristone plus misoprostol [5]. We conducted a retrospective chart review of women who underwent medical abortion via telemedicine between May 1, 2012, and May 1, 2013, at Willow Women's Clinic, Vancouver, Canada. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. To be eligible for a telemedicine abortion at the study clinic, women must live in British Columbia (where the clinic physicians are licensed); have access to a laboratory for timely serum quantitative hCG estimations; and be able to travel to the clinic or to another community facility for surgical completion, if necessary. They see a physician and counselor via Skype (Microsoft Skype Division, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg) videoconferencing for screening, information, and consent. The women go to a local laboratory for hCG tests at initial screening, on the day of the medication, and 1 week later (3 tests). If their hCG level is above 5000 mIU/mL, an ultrasound is arranged. Rhesus-negative women are offered anti-D; this is arranged through a local facility. The medications are couriered or a prescription is faxed to a local pharmacy. Women have a follow-up videoconferencing appointment to discuss their blood test results and any reactions to the medications. If their hCG level has fallen by 80% in 1 week, women are informed that the abortion is complete and that they require no further follow-up. If additional medication, surgery, or further blood tests are required, they are arranged by the clinic. Between May 2012 and May 2013, 11 women underwent medical abortion via telemedicine at the study clinic (Table 1). One woman experienced spontaneous abortion with no medication, 1 woman required surgical completion, and 1 woman was lost to follow-up; the other women experienced uneventful medical abortion. During the study period, a further 29 women were seen in-clinic for their first visit and ultrasound, with scheduled videoconferencing for follow-up; in addition, 1858 women made regular in-clinic visits. The main innovation with regard to this program is that we see patients in their own homes using their own technology (a computer or smart phone), yet provide the same physician and counseling services as we do in the clinic. This method of providing abortion via telemedicine is feasible in the present setting and may improve access to abortion. The author has no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it