MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bypass Margins, Basin-Restricted Wedges, and Platform-to-Basin Correlation, Upper Devonian, Canadian Rocky Mountains: Implications for Sequence Stratigraphy of Carbonate Platform Systems

2000· article· en· W2118210458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDevonianStructural basinSequence stratigraphyCarbonatePaleontologySequence (biology)StratigraphyCarbonate platformGeomorphologySedimentary depositional environmentTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Carbonate platforms can commonly keep up with relative sea-level rise because of high rates of sediment accumulation and platform aggradation. Surrounding basinal environments are commonly starved but can receive variable extrabasinal siliciclastic input and episodically deposited carbonate sediment. If accumulation rates in basinal settings lag behind those of the platform, a bypass or erosional margin can develop. Under these circumstances platform and basin depositional sequences become physically detached and direct correlation of basinal and platform sequences is hindered. We report here the results of high-resolution stratigraphic analyses of two Upper Devonian isolated carbonate platforms in western Alberta that provide insight into the sequence stratigraphy of bypass margins and criteria for accurate correlation of platform and basinal sequences. The slope and basin sequences surrounding the Miette and Ancient Wall platforms consist of basin-restricted, onlapping wedges of fine-grained background sediment deposited dominantly from suspension and coarse-grained platform-derived sediment redeposited by a variety of gravity-flow mechanisms. Sequence boundaries are identified within the redeposited carbonate intervals. Identification of sequence boundaries and differentiation of highstand and lowstand slope and basinal facies was based on the geometry, mineralogy, and clast content of redeposited carbonate units. Highstand carbonates contain sheet-like debris flows and turbidites with abundant slope-derived clasts and background facies with high total carbonate content. Lowstand carbonates contain sheet-like and channelized debris flows and turbidites with abundant platform-derived clasts and background facies with low carbonate content and locally high amounts of organic carbon. Transgressive facies are dominated by initially carbonate-poor and organic-rich background sediments that display a progressive increase in carbonate content and decrease in organic carbon content. These patterns are interpreted to record abundant background carbonate sedimentation during late transgression and highstand when the carbonate factory was robust. Highstand redeposited carbonates record slope erosion due to oversteepening and slope readjustment processes. Lowstand redeposited carbonates indicate platform and platform-margin erosion and low background carbonate sedimentation when the platform was either exposed or under very shallow peritidal conditions. High siliciclastic and organic contents during lowstand and early transgression may partly be the result of reciprocal sedimentation but alternatively may represent continuous siliciclastic supply during times with little dilution by fine-grained carbonate sediment. Successive stages of platform development at Miette and Ancient Wall were controlled by accommodation changes driven by relative sea-level fluctuations. Backstripping analyses of strata from both platforms confirm that significant differential subsidence was a major control on variations in platform thickness and patterns of slope development. Greater subsidence at Ancient Wall fostered the development of a steeper bypass margin and different slope evolution compared to Miette. Slope oversteepening also initiated a process of slope readjustment that eventually reduced the platform-to-basin gradient and facilitated regressive platform progradation. In conventional siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy, basin-restricted wedges are interpreted as lowstand deposits on the basis of their geometry and position relative to an updip margin. Wedge-shaped basinal units along the Miette and Ancient Wall bypass margins contain both highstand and lowstand facies that straddle sequence boundaries. The results of this study provide objective criteria for differentiating systems tracts in carbonate slope and basin environments through mineralogic and compositional analyses providing more accurate correlation of detached platform and basin sequences. Interpretation of carbonate basin-restricted wedges as purely highstand or lowstand deposits may lead to erroneous conclusions regarding sequence stratigraphy, platform-to-basin correlation, and the volumetric partitioning of sediments deposited in different systems tracts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it