MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118218801 · doi:10.1049/ip-smt:20000420

New formula to calculate the skin effect in isolated tubular conductors at low frequencies

2000· article· en· W2118218801 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Science Measurement and Technology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConductorSkin effectElectrical conductorInterpolation (computer graphics)MathematicsExact solutions in general relativityMathematical analysisMaterials scienceGeometryPhysicsComposite materialClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exact solution of the AC/DC resistance ratio of an isolated tubular conductor involves the calculation of values from 12 Kelvin functions. Previous approximate solutions are complicated, and graphical solutions require interpolation from sets of curves. A simplified solution, based on a new formula, is presented. The values of the resistance ratio derived from this formula are within ±1% of those derived from the exact solution in the practical ranges 0.05 ≤ (thickness/diameter) ≤ 0.40 and 0 < √(frequency/DC resistance) ≤ 3000, except for t/D2 = 0.40 and √(f/Rdc) > 2000. For practical tubular conductors, the formula can be used for frequencies up to about 10 kHz, depending on the thickness t and the outer diameter D2. The application of the skin effect formula to a steel-cored conductor can result in significant error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it