MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization of the magnetotelluric tensor in terms of its invariants

2000· article· en· W2118230965 on OpenAlexafffund
J. T. Weaver, Alok Agarwal, F. E. M. Lilley

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersAustralian National UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsMagnetotelluricsInvariant (physics)GeologyGeometryTensor (intrinsic definition)Rotation (mathematics)GeophysicsGaussianElectrical impedanceMathematical analysisPhysicsMathematicsElectrical resistivity and conductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The magnetotelluric impedance tensor is defined in terms of seven independent parameters that are invariant under a rotation of the horizontal axes on the surface of the Earth, plus an angle that defines the orientation of the axes of reference. The invariants are algebraically related to but nevertheless different from those recently proposed by Szarka & Menvielle (1997). They have been chosen in such a way as to have clear representations on a Mohr circle diagram and also to reveal geoelectric properties of the Earth near the site where the impedance data are measured. The first two invariants define the properties of a 1-D earth when the next four invariants are negligibly small. If the next two are also non-negligible, the earth is 2-D with a strike direction that can be recovered. The last three invariants indicate different degrees of three-dimensionality and the discussion of them with reference to small-scale galvanic distortion in an otherwise 1or 2-D structure largely retraces the insightful pioneering work of Bahr (1988). The properties of the invariants are illustrated with numerical calculations for a synthetic model consisting of a small conductive anomaly in the form of a cube at the surface of an otherwise 2-D earth that is divided by a vertical fault into regions with a strong resistivity contrast. Results are presented for synthetic data that contain only numerical noise, and for data to which 2 per cent random Gaussian noise has been added. The theoretical properties of the invariants are verified by the pure numerical data, and are confirmed statistically by the noisy data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations160
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207