Characterization of the magnetotelluric tensor in terms of its invariants
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The magnetotelluric impedance tensor is defined in terms of seven independent parameters that are invariant under a rotation of the horizontal axes on the surface of the Earth, plus an angle that defines the orientation of the axes of reference. The invariants are algebraically related to but nevertheless different from those recently proposed by Szarka & Menvielle (1997). They have been chosen in such a way as to have clear representations on a Mohr circle diagram and also to reveal geoelectric properties of the Earth near the site where the impedance data are measured. The first two invariants define the properties of a 1-D earth when the next four invariants are negligibly small. If the next two are also non-negligible, the earth is 2-D with a strike direction that can be recovered. The last three invariants indicate different degrees of three-dimensionality and the discussion of them with reference to small-scale galvanic distortion in an otherwise 1or 2-D structure largely retraces the insightful pioneering work of Bahr (1988). The properties of the invariants are illustrated with numerical calculations for a synthetic model consisting of a small conductive anomaly in the form of a cube at the surface of an otherwise 2-D earth that is divided by a vertical fault into regions with a strong resistivity contrast. Results are presented for synthetic data that contain only numerical noise, and for data to which 2 per cent random Gaussian noise has been added. The theoretical properties of the invariants are verified by the pure numerical data, and are confirmed statistically by the noisy data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it