MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118417501 · doi:10.4236/ars.2013.22020

Monitoring Wheat and Rapeseed by Using Synchronous Optical and Radar Satellite Data—From Temporal Signatures to Crop Parameters Estimation

2013· article· en· W2118417501 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rémy Fieuzal, Frédéric Baup, Claire Marais-Sicre

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Remote Sensing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyCanadian Space AgencyCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesEuropean Space Agency
KeywordsRemote sensingSatelliteRadarEnvironmental scienceC bandNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexMicrowaveBackscatter (email)GeologyPhysicsClimate changeComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the sensitivity of multi-temporal SAR data acquired at different frequencies (X-, C-and L-bands), polarizations (HH, VV, VH and HV) and incidence angles (from 24° to 53°) during the growing season of two winter crops (rapeseed and wheat). This study was part of a multi-sensor crop-monitoring experiment that was performed from February to November 2010 (MCM’10). During the experiment, dense series of satellite data were acquired in microwave, optical and thermal domains (more than 150 images were provided by TerraSAR-X, Radarsat-2 Alos, Formosat-2, Spot-4/5 and Landsat-5/7) were synchronous with ground measurements over an agricultural area located in southwestern France, near Toulouse. An angular normalization of radar signals is first performed for each crop type at X-and C-bands by using a dense temporal satellite series and the complementarity provided by microwave and optical data. The results show that the angular sensitivity of radar backscatter decreases with the increase of the vegetation index (from 0.4 dB.°ˉ1 over bare soils to 0.05 dB.°ˉ1 for fully vegetated fields). Lower angular sensitivity is observed at X-band (compared to C-band), and for the cross-polarized signal. Analyses of the temporal signatures of the radar backscatter show a well-marked signal dynamic at X-, C-and L-bands, depending on the crops and theirs associated phenological stages. During the stems elongation of wheat while the NDVI increases of 0.2, a dynamic of 10 dB is observed at X-band and at C-band with VV polarization. Interesting behaviors are also observed during the crop senescence with an increase of several dB (depending on the sensor configuration), while the NDVI decreases of 0.5. Over rapeseed, cross-polarized backscatters offer promising dynamic of 6 dB during the seed development, while the NDVI saturates at maximum values. The use of radar signals, in complement of optical, for crop parameters monitoring is achieved in terms of leaf area index and crop height estimations. Over rapeseed, best correlations between crop parameters and radar signals are obtained at C-band, by combining co-and cross-polarized backscatters (R2 > 0.61). Over wheat, best results are achieved by using X-band data (R2 > 0.64).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Remote SensingSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207