MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118527125 · doi:10.2214/ajr.185.3.01850608

Pulmonary Infections After Bone Marrow Transplantation: High-Resolution CT Findings in 111 Patients

2005· article· en· W2118527125 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Roentgenology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematological disorders and diagnostics
Canadian institutionsVancouver General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBone marrow transplantationTransplantationHigh resolutionBone marrowBone transplantationBone marrow transplantRadiologyNuclear medicinePathologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review the high-resolution CT findings in patients with pulmonary infection after bone marrow transplantation and to determine distinguishing features among the various types of infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 111 consecutive bone marrow transplant recipients who had documented pulmonary infection, high-resolution CT of the chest performed within 24 hr of the beginning of symptoms, and proven diagnosis within 1 week of the onset of symptoms. Two radiologists analyzed the CT scans and reached final decisions regarding the findings by consensus. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher's exact test and multivariate analysis; a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The pulmonary infections were due to viruses (n = 57), bacteria (n = 26), fungi (n = 21), and protozoa (n = 1). Six patients had more than one organism responsible for the infection. Nodules that were 1 cm or more in diameter were seen in 13 (62%) of 21 patients with fungal pneumonia, five (19%) of 26 patients with bacterial pneumonia (p = 0.0059), three (10%) of 30 with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) pneumonia (p = 0.0001), and three (14%) of 22 with cytomegalovirus pneumonia (p = 0.0016). The halo sign was present in 10 of 21 patients with fungal pneumonia, two of 26 with bacterial pneumonia (p = 0.0026), three of 30 with RSV pneumonia (p = 0.0036), and one of 22 with cytomegalovirus pneumonia (p = 0.0015). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of the other CT patterns including small nodules, ground-glass attenuation, and air-space consolidation among viral, bacterial, and fungal infections (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The presence of large nodules and visualization of the halo sign are most suggestive of fungal infection. Other high-resolution CT patterns are not helpful in distinguishing among the various types of infection seen in bone marrow transplant recipients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it