MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118536257 · doi:10.1109/vtcf.2006.348

An Adaptive-Scaling Algorithm for OFDM PAR Reduction Using Active Constellation Extension

2006· article· en· W2118536257 on OpenAlexaff
Luqing Wang, C. Tellambura

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClipping (morphology)AlgorithmReduction (mathematics)Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexingConstellationComputer scienceConstellation diagramLossless compressionScalingMathematicsBit error rateData compressionTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)Decoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The active constellation extension (ACE) technique is a lossless (in terms of throughput) peak-to-average power ratio (PAR) reduction technique that adaptively extends the signal constellation while ensuring that the minimum distance between any two constellation points does not decrease. However, this technique increases the average transmit power. In this paper, we propose an adaptive-scaling algorithm for the implementation of ACE. This algorithm, based on the clipping and filtering technique, uses only the peak samples of clipping noise to reduce PAR. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm has better PAR reduction, lower complexity and smaller BER than the previously proposed Smart Gradient-Project ACE algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Vehicular Technology ConferenceSame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207