A graph theoretic approach to cache-conscious placement of data for direct mapped caches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Caches were designed to amortize the cost of memory accesses by moving copies of frequently accessed data closer to the processor. Over the years the increasing gap between processor speed and memory access latency has made the cache a bottleneck for program performance. Enhancing cache performance has been instrumental in speeding up programs. For this reason several hardware and software techniques have been proposed by researchers to optimize the cache for minimizing the number of misses. Among these are compile-time data placement techniques in memory which improve cache performance. For the purpose of this work, we concern ourselves with the problem of laying out data in memory given the sequence of accesses on a finite set of data objects such that cache-misses are minimized. The problem has been shown to be hard to solve optimally even if the sequence of data accesses is known at compile time. In this paper we show that given a direct-mapped cache, its size, and the data access sequence, it is possible to identify the instances where there are no conflict misses. We describe an algorithm that can assign the data to cache for minimal number of misses if there exists a way in which conflict misses can be avoided altogether. We also describe the implementation of a heuristic for assigning data to cache for instances where the size of the cache forces conflict misses. Experiments show that our technique results in a 30% reduction in the number of cache misses compared to the original assignment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".