"Every Woman Needs Courage": Feminist Periodicals in 1970s West Germany
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the role of national feminist periodicals in the West German women’s movement during the late 1970s. It focuses on how feminist ideas of autonomy were applied to magazine administration. As women’s centres began to decline, national publications worked as co-ordinating forces for the largely decentralized network of groups and institutions that made up the German women’s movement. Sources such as internal papers and letters are used in addition to the magazines themselves in order to examine the political goals and ideologies communicated by these periodicals and their editors. Each magazine’s organizational principles are assessed in terms of their influence on editorial development and relationship to political ideologies of the women’s movement. This paper shows that the autonomous organizational principles of national feminist periodicals were characterized by an anti-hierarchal impulse expressed through emphases on editorial fluidity and individual thought.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it