MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118935719 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2008.4616906

Application of artificial neural networks for electromagnetic modeling and computational electromagnetics

2008· article· en· W2118935719 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagneticsComputational electromagneticsArtificial neural networkMaxima and minimaParticle swarm optimizationComputer scienceComputationMethod of moments (probability theory)Domain (mathematical analysis)BackpropagationAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceElectromagnetic fieldElectronic engineeringMathematicsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an overview of emerging artificial neural network (ANN) techniques and applications for electromagnetic (EM) simulation and design. Accurate time domain EM modeling using recurrent neural networks (RNNs) is reviewed. Advanced robust training algorithm combining particle swarm optimization (PSO) and quasi-Newton method is described through frequency domain EM modeling, showing its ability to avoid ANN training being trapped in local minima to obtain accurate models. ANN applications in computational electromagnetics are also discussed. Great efficiency can be achieved by using ANNs to approximate the computationally intensive calculations in solving Maxwell equations using method of moments (MoM). As illustrated in examples, these ANN-based techniques are capable of fast and accurate EM modeling and MoM computation, and useful for efficient EM based design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it