MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119293362 · doi:10.1007/s10540-005-2882-9

Thyroid Hormone and the Energetic Cost of Keeping Body Temperature

2005· review· en· W2119293362 on OpenAlexaff
J. Enrique Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscience Reports · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationDownloadTable of contentsComputer scienceLibrary scienceInformation retrievalWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By definition, homeothermic species maintain their core temperature (Tc) regu-lated within narrow limits. In most of these species, the hypothalamic thermostat is set somewhere between 36 and 38C, and Tc is tightly kept there, in spite of highly variable ambient temperatures. Several mechanisms to maintain body temperature have been selected during evolution. Vasoconstriction and piloerec-tion are mechanisms to save heat, while vasodilatation, sweating and perspiration are mechanisms to rapidly dissipate heat. To maintain temperature in environ-ments usually colder than Tc, homeothermic species need to produce more heat than poikilothermic species. Energy transformations generate heat simply by virtue of the laws of thermodynamics and so the energy transformations inherent to life generate heat. Such heat, generated as byproduct of cell vital functions, is called obligatory thermogenesis (OT) and is expectedly higher in homeothermic species, as a consequence of which metabolic rate is substantially higher in these species than in poikilothermic species (Else and Hulbert, 1981). In addition to having a higher OT, homeothermic species can also activate specific mechanisms

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioscience ReportsSame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207