MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119345721 · doi:10.1109/tbme.2007.895747

Extended-Hungarian-JPDA: Exact Single-Frame Stem Cell Tracking

2007· article· en· W2119345721 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsProbabilistic logicTracking (education)Frame (networking)Computer scienceStem cellGaussianAlgorithmMathematicsMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fields of bioinformatics and biotechnology rely on the collection, processing and analysis of huge numbers of biocellular images, including cell features such as cell size, shape, and motility. Thus, cell tracking is of crucial importance in the study of cell behaviour and in drug and disease research. Such a multitarget tracking is essentially an assignment problem, NP-hard, with the solution normally found in practice in a reduced hypothesis space. In this paper we introduce a novel approach to find the exact association solution over time for single-frame scan-back stem cell tracking. Our proposed method employs a class of linear programming optimization methods known as the Hungarian method to find the optimal joint probabilistic data association for nonlinear dynamics and non-Gaussian measurements. The proposed method, an optimal joint probabilistic data association approach, has been successfully applied to track hematopoietic stem cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it