Time–Frequency Matrix Feature Extraction and Classification of Environmental Audio Signals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Audio feature extraction and classification are important tools for audio signal analysis in many applications, such as multimedia indexing and retrieval, and auditory scene analysis. However, due to the nonstationarities and discontinuities exist in these signals, their quantification and classification remains a formidable challenge. In this paper, we develop a new approach for audio feature extraction to effectively quantify these nonstationarities in an attempt to achieve high classification accuracy for environmental audio signals. Our approach consists of three stages: first we propose to construct the time-frequency matrix (TFM) of audio signals using matching-pursuit time-frequency distribution (MP-TFD) technique, and then apply the non-negative matrix decomposition (NMF) technique to decompose the TFM into its significant components. Finally, we propose seven novel features from the spectral and temporal structures of the decomposed vectors in a way that they successfully represent joint TF structure of the audio signal, and combine them with the Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) features. These features are examined using a database of 192 environmental audio signals which includes 20 aircraft, 17 helicopter, 20 drum, 15 flute, 20 piano, 20 animal, 20 bird, and 20 insect sounds, and the speech of 20 males and 20 females. The results of the numerical simulation support the effectiveness of the proposed approach for environmental audio classification with over 10% accuracy-rate improvement compared to the MFCC features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it