MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119790020 · doi:10.3138/infor.45.3.123

A Survey of the Generalized Assignment Problem and Its Applications

2007· article· en· W2119790020 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNaif Arab University for Security Sciences
KeywordsKnapsack problemHeuristicGeneralized assignment problemMathematical optimizationMetaheuristicVariable neighborhood searchScheduling (production processes)Assignment problemComputer scienceFrequency assignmentSimple (philosophy)Operations researchMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractGiven n items and m knapsacks, the Generalized Assignment Problem (GAP) is to find the optimum assignment of each item to exactly one knapsack, without exceeding the capacity of any knapsack. This problem can also be described as the optimal assignment of n jobs to m capacitated agents. During the last three decades, many papers have been published on the GAP. In this survey we mainly concentrate on its real-life applications in scheduling, timetabling, telecommunication, facility location, transportation, production planning, etc. We also mention some of the most recent solution approaches: from state-of-the-art metaheuristics to variable neighborhood search algorithms and from exact solution procedures to simple heuristic algorithms.Keywords: Applicationsknapsackgeneralized assignment problem

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it