MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119863390 · doi:10.82308/26339

Odd cycles in planar graphs

2005· dissertation· en· W2119863390 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nadia Hardy

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Packing Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsCombinatoricsComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a graph G = (V, E), an odd cycle cover is a subset of the vertices whose removal makes the graph bipartite, that is, it meets all odd cycles in G. A packing in G is a collection of vertex disjoint odd cycles. This thesis addresses algorithmic and structural problems concerning odd cycle covers and packings. In particular, we consider the two NP-hard problems of finding a maximum packing and a minimum covering. In 1994 Brass [53] conjectured that tau, the minimum size of an odd cycle cover, is at most twice nu, the maximum size of a packing. The conjecture is known to be false in general [11, 41]. We prove here that tau < 10nu for planar graphs. Our structural results leads to the first constant approximation algorithm for the packing problem. The covering problem was shown to be tractable for graphs of constant sized solutions [42]. We give a linear time algorithm for the covering problem restricted to the case where the graphs have constant sized solutions and are planar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicOptimization and Packing ProblemsFrench-language works237,207