A circular mesh scheme for the non-orthogonal finite difference time domain method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beam forming networks (BFN) are an important component of a complex satellite antenna system because they are used to provide accurate amplitude and phase excitation to the elements of the feed network. The need for handling high power and the need for a high degree of integrability, often leads one to choose square coaxial metal lines for constructing BFNs. BFNs usually require variable power dividers such as the rat-race (or ring) couplers with constant or variable divider ratios in order to deliver a prescribed amount of power to a certain element of an antenna array to steer the beam in a desired direction. However, modeling of such circular structures in square coaxial form is not an easy task. To account for the structure complexity and diversity requires a numerical method with a known flexibility, versatility, and accuracy. In the paper, it is shown that the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method equipped with a circular mesh generator is highly suited to handling these kinds of discontinuities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it