MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120227055 · doi:10.1109/isic.1992.225124

Adaptive neural networks for vision-guided position control of a robot arm

2003· article· en· W2120227055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsController (irrigation)Computer scienceInverse kinematicsArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceRobotRobotic armComputer visionKinematicsPosition (finance)Control theory (sociology)Projection (relational algebra)Perspective (graphical)Control engineeringControl (management)EngineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A robot arm controlled by a neural network architecture using visual input is described. The arm can reach targets without prior geometric calibration. All control signal effects are learned by the controller through visual observation during a training period and refined during actual operation. Minor changes in the system's configuration result in a brief period of degraded performance while the controller adapts (in real time) to the new mappings. It is shown that a neural-network-based controller can perform accurately, taking into account the nonlinearities of various transformations. Such a controller is easy to train, tolerant of imprecise equipment configurations, and insensitive to camera perturbations following training. The method is simpler than traditional control techniques, which require the solution of the inverse perspective projection and inverse kinematics of the system.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it