MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120561279 · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.191

Polarimetric image segmentation via maximum-likelihood approximation and efficient multiphase level-sets

2006· article· en· W2120561279 on OpenAlexaff
Ismail Ben Ayed, Amar Mitiche, Ziad Belhadj

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage segmentationArtificial intelligencePartition (number theory)SegmentationPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsImage (mathematics)Constraint (computer-aided design)Computer scienceAlgorithmGeometryCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates a level set method for complex polarimetric image segmentation. It consists of minimizing a functional containing an original observation term derived from maximum-likelihood approximation and a complex Wishart/Gaussian image representation and a classical boundary length prior. The minimization is carried out efficiently by a new multiphase method which embeds a simple partition constraint directly in curve evolution to guarantee a partition of the image domain from an arbitrary initial partition. Results are shown on both synthetic and real images. Quantitative performance evaluation and comparisons are also given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine IntelligenceSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207