MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120907414 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2011.2167721

Fault Location Method Based on Single-End Measurements for Underground Cables

2011· article· en· W2120907414 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhasorFault (geology)ConductorCapacitanceEngineeringVoltageElectrical conductorDirect-buried cableElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringElectric power systemMaterials scienceCable harnessGeologyPower (physics)ElectrodeCable gland

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fault location in underground cables is characterized as the technical difficulties due to complexities in cables. Based on the direct circuit analysis, a fault location algorithm for underground cables with no laterals is presented in this paper. The single-end phasor measurements, including the voltages and currents sampled in the substation side, are utilized to locate the single phase faults in the typical single-conductor cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) cables rated at the medium voltage (MV) levels. The distinctive cable characteristics are considered, such as relatively large capacitance, effects of sheaths and sheath bonding methods. The different fault scenarios are taken into account as well. The effect of changes of cable parameters and application of static response load model are also investigated. The simulation studies demonstrate the proposed algorithm can achieve the high accuracy under various system and fault conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it