MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptive L_p—Norm Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio Networks

2011· article· en· W2120940736 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioAdditive white Gaussian noiseDetectorAlgorithmFalse alarmGaussian noiseRayleigh fadingComputer scienceNorm (philosophy)Detection theoryFadingMathematicsElectronic engineeringWirelessTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)StatisticsEngineeringDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cognitive radio (CR) systems, reliable spectrum sensing techniques are required in order to avoid interference to the primary users of the spectrum. Whereas most of the existing literature on spectrum sensing considers impairment by additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) only, in practice, CRs also have to cope with various types of non-Gaussian noise such as man-made impulsive noise, co-channel interference, and ultra-wideband interference. In this paper, we propose an adaptive L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</sub> -norm detector which does not require any a priori knowledge about the primary user signal and performs well for a wide range of circularly symmetric non-Gaussian noises with finite moments. We analyze the probabilities of false alarm and missed detection of the proposed detector in Rayleigh fading in the low signal-to-noise ratio regime and investigate its asymptotic performance if the number of samples available for spectrum sensing is large. Furthermore, we consider the deflection coefficient for optimization of the L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</sub> -norm parameters and discuss its connection to the probabilities of false alarm and missed detection. Based on the deflection coefficient an adaptive algorithm for online optimization of the L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</sub> -norm parameters is developed. Analytical and simulation results show that the proposed L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</sub> -norm detector yields significant performance gains compared to conventional energy detection in non-Gaussian noise and approaches the performance of the locally optimal detector which requires knowledge of the noise distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it