Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a global motion planner for dextrous manipulation of 3D objects by a multifingered robotic hand. We focus on the reconfiguration problem: find a feasible quasi-static trajectory (motions and contact forces) that moves a hand-object system from an initial grasp to a final desired configuration of the object. The planner is designed as a two-level process: a global level that expands a tree of sub-goals in the configuration space of the object, and a local level that searches for feasible quasi-static trajectories of the entire manipulation system between adjacent sub-goals. A key feature of the planner is that it exploits the redundancy of the system by using, in a complementary way, different canonical manipulation modes and tackles the high dimensionality of the solution space (configuration and control spaces) by making use, instantaneously, of a random search over it. The planner is applied in simulation for achieving several nontrivial reconfiguration tasks for (piecewise-) smooth convex objects demonstrating the promise of our approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it