MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121234560 · doi:10.1177/1534650106298917

The Girl Who Ate Her House—Pica as an Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

2008· article· en· W2121234560 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Case Studies · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTherapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPica (typography)PsychologyObsessive compulsiveDistressGirlEating disordersEtiologyPsychopathologyAnxietyPsychiatryPsychotherapistDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report concerns the interesting clinical phenomenology of a 17-year-old Ethiopian female student with a long-standing history of ingesting nonnutritive materials. She was initially non-selective, but later began more exclusively consuming mud obtained from a wall in front of her house. She suffered from a feeding and eating disorder known as pica. Currently, there is no clearly established etiology for pica. This patient's particular psychopathology—recurrent, unwanted, intrusive images and thoughts of the mud wall and of eating the mud; feelings of distress and anxiousness that were not relieved unless she consumed mud; and significant effects on her daily life from her uncontrollable need to return home to eat mud from her wall—suggests an ego-dystonic, obsessive thought-distress-consumption-relief pattern that is consistent with obsessive-compulsive disorder. This case may contribute to the etiological understanding that some forms of pica may be part of the obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.293
GPT teacher head0.577
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it