Bibliographic record
Abstract
English Where violence is monopolized by the state, the social construction of fear often takes the form of the fear of God. Civil society and the fear of God have been subtly interwoven for a long time in Europe and North America. The “democratic transition” has taken the shape in several countries of Latin America of growing civil violence. This violence is no longer openly monitored by the state and seems to arise from unbridled individualism reinforced by neoliberalism. Street gangs and mafia networks are clear signs of this privatized violence. The fear of being killed is also experienced as the danger of falling into a state of indifference towards being a killer oneself; and this gives rise to feelings that verge on a state of “conversion”. These new social constructions of fear help to explain the success of Pentecostalism and, more broadly, of charismatic movements. French Là où la violence est monopolisée par l'Etat, la construction sociale de la peur prend souvent la forme de la crainte de Dieu. En Europe et en Amérique du Nord, de subtiles complémentarités se sont longtemps tissées entre société civile et crainte de Dieu. La 'transition démocratique' en Amérique latine s'est concrétisée dans de nombreux pays par un accroissement de la violence civile. Cette violence n'est plus ouvertement contrôlée par l'Etat et semble relever d'un individualisme débridé, renforcé par le néo-libéralisme. Les gangs de rue et les connexions mafieuses sont une manifestation de cette violence privatisée. La peur d'être tué se vit en même temps comme péril de tomber dans une indifférence à tuer soi-même et mobilise l'émotion vers un état de 'conversion'. Ce nouvel imaginaire social de la peur rend en partie compte du succès du pentecôtisme et plus largement des mouvements charismatiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".