MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121522147 · doi:10.5555/563998.564024

Mapping reference code to irregular DSPs within the retargetable, optimizing compiler COGEN(T)

2001· article· en· W2121522147 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Symposium on Microarchitecture · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCompilerDead codeUnreachable codeCode (set theory)Parallel computingCode generationProgramming languageRedundant codeObject codeScheduleAbstractionSet (abstract data type)Dead code eliminationInstruction setOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generating high quality code for embedded processors is made difficult by irregular architectures and highly encoded parallel instructions. Rather than deal with the target machine at every stage of the compilation, a promising new methodology employs generic algorithms to optimize code for an idealized abstraction of the true target machine. This code, called reference code, is then mapped to the real instruction set by enhanced genetic algorithms. One perturbs the original schedule to find a number of alternative (parallel) instruction sequences, and the other evolves feasible register assignments, if possible, for each sequence. This paper describes the strategy for mapping idealized code into actual code. The COGEN(T) system employs this methodology to produce good code for different commercial DSPs and ASIPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it