MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122167705 · doi:10.3109/13816810.2010.544361

Why Some Photoreceptors Die, While Others Remain Dormant: Lessons From<i>RPE65</i>and<i>LRAT</i>Associated Retinal Dystrophies

2011· review· en· W2122167705 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Genetics · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRPE65Visual phototransductionApoptosisAutophagyRetinalBiologyCell biologyNeuroscienceGenetic enhancementRetinaOphthalmologyGeneMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Why some photoreceptors die and other do not is not well understood, but is a fascinating and important emerging concept, now that gene and drug therapy have shown preliminary positive results in treatments for patients with gene specific retinal degenerations. RESULTS: This review discusses these concepts and a new study that shows that continuous activation of the phototransduction cascade activates Bcl-2 apoptotic pathways. Knockout out of Bax revealed rescue from apoptosis, indicating that bax inhibition may be an avenue for pharmocological intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it