Statistical Analysis of Field Data for Precipitation Icing Accretion on Overhead Power Lines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the analysis of field data gathered at the Mont Belair icing test site in Quebec. Load cell evaluations of actual icing loads on an existing 315-kV line are correlated to hourly measurements of ambient temperature, wind speed, precipitation rate, and number of signals of the Ice Rate Meter (IRM), in order to establish a numerical model for precipitation icing accretion on overhead line conductors. The correlation analysis is limited to precipitation ice events, or those mixed with relatively short periods of in-cloud icing. Emission of IRM signals is used as a criterion to distinguish the accumulation phase of an ice event, from persistence and shedding, characterized by no emission of IRM signals. The results from the analysis show that the icing rate corresponding to wet growth is much larger than that in dry conditions. What is more surprising, it was also found that the icing rate during periods when winds blow parallel to the line axis is significantly greater than that with perpendicular winds. The linear fit to the set of multivariate data is usually applicable. However, in some relatively rare cases of wet growth in heavy precipitations without IRM signals, the linear model may be inadequate and quadratic polynomials must be used. The results from the application of the numerical model are in excellent agreement with the field observations. This empirical model can be very useful for evaluation of icing loads on energized transmission lines, when there are not available measurements by load cells or other direct methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it